Reviving Material Theories of Induction
John D. Norton says philosophers have been led astray for thousands of years by their attempt to treat induction formally.
ReadJohn D. Norton says philosophers have been led astray for thousands of years by their attempt to treat induction formally.
ReadSumma Logicae, part 3-3, chapters 31–36, trans. John P. McCaskey, September 18, 2017 The text here is from Opera Philosophica,
ReadFordham University, Center for Medieval Studies, December 6, 2016
ReadHarvard University, Program in Science, Technology, and Society, November 30, 2015.
ReadNot all conceptions of induction rely on a uniformity principle. The Socratic, Aristotelian and Baconian didn’t.
ReadDavid Hume didn’t think he had anything important to say about induction. That’s just one myth in the history of induction.
ReadMill’s project was not to promote induction but to replace it with his own Hypothetical and Deductive Methods.
ReadAn article, co-authored with Steffen Ducheyne, in which I trace the sources for John Stuart Mill’s views on induction.
ReadAnalytic statements have gotten a bad rap. But shorn of unfortunate associations, there is nothing wrong with them.
ReadUniversity of Pittsburgh, Center for Philosophy of Science, October 17, 2014.
ReadTo solve the problem of induction, we should distinguish general statements from universal ones and recognize the fundamental importance of the first.
ReadMcCaskey here seeks to recover a lost conception of induction, one whose leading theoreticians were William Whewell, Francis Bacon, Socrates, and Aristotle.
ReadNew York University, History of Science Lecture Series, December 4, 2013.
ReadMy dissertation. A account of how philosophical induction was conceived in the ancient world and how that conception was later rediscovered by, especially, Francis Bacon.
ReadPrior Analytics II 23 is not really about induction by complete enumeration, as all commentators have thought.
ReadA book review in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
ReadA review on Amazon, September 2010.
ReadSt. John’s University, Philosophy Department, October 2007.
Read