History of ‘Temperature’: Maturation of a Measurement Concept
The accepted manuscript for this conceptual etymology of “temperature,” to be published in Annals of Science, is below.
ReadThe accepted manuscript for this conceptual etymology of “temperature,” to be published in Annals of Science, is below.
ReadJohn D. Norton says philosophers have been led astray for thousands of years by their attempt to treat induction formally.
ReadSumma Logicae, part 3-3, chapters 31–36, trans. John P. McCaskey, September 18, 2017 The text here is from Opera Philosophica,
ReadFordham University, Center for Medieval Studies, December 6, 2016
ReadFor the academic year 2015–6, I will be the Medieval Fellow at Fordham University’s Center for Medieval Studies.
ReadRegulating weapons is a core responsibility for any government. It should be done in a way that protects the natural rights of citizens, including that of self-defense.
ReadDuring the Renaissance, an older understanding of induction, one prevalent in antiquity, was rediscovered and adopted.
ReadA book review in HOPOS, Spring 2015.
ReadIn this lecture, I trace how Americans have conceptualized rights since the nation’s founding until today.
ReadA section of Columbia University’s famous two-semester Contemporary Civilization seminar.
ReadHarvard University, Program in Science, Technology, and Society, November 30, 2015.
ReadA proper defense of gay marriage requires distinguishing the natural right to marry and the civil right to a civil marriage.
ReadNot all conceptions of induction rely on a uniformity principle. The Socratic, Aristotelian and Baconian didn’t.
ReadHere is how to analyze—and argue with anyone about—any public policy, no matter what your political views are.
ReadDavid Hume didn’t think he had anything important to say about induction. That’s just one myth in the history of induction.
ReadMill’s project was not to promote induction but to replace it with his own Hypothetical and Deductive Methods.
ReadAn article, co-authored with Steffen Ducheyne, in which I trace the sources for John Stuart Mill’s views on induction.
ReadTo understand free will, think about how your will differs from a dog’s. Don’t compare yourself to a rock.
ReadYou need a way to determine what will make you happy in life. The science that figures that out is ethics.
ReadAnalytic statements have gotten a bad rap. But shorn of unfortunate associations, there is nothing wrong with them.
ReadUniversity of Pittsburgh, Center for Philosophy of Science, October 17, 2014.
ReadWhy are rights to vote, to be angry, and to peaceably assemble all called rights? Because it would be wrong for someone to stop you.
ReadWe have to accept that some people can benefit from the sins of others.
ReadA course on the changing ways Americans have defended free-market capitalism, from the country’s founding to today.
ReadNo, it is not legal for professors to upload or copy readings for your students, not even using password-protected course sites.
ReadTo solve the problem of induction, we should distinguish general statements from universal ones and recognize the fundamental importance of the first.
ReadIf your goal is to make the world a better place for people, don’t worry at all about man-made climate change.
ReadMcCaskey here seeks to recover a lost conception of induction, one whose leading theoreticians were William Whewell, Francis Bacon, Socrates, and Aristotle.
ReadFirst ever collated Latin edition and English translation of Jacopo Zabarella on method and regressus.
ReadA new libertarianism is coming. It is based on progressive rather than individualistic ideology and advocates a universal welfare system.
ReadToday’s quiz: Match the political philosopher with his or her view of human nature. Hint: They both believe we should design political
ReadProperty is not on that list with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. And shouldn’t be.
ReadAyn Rand’s whole philosophical system rests on a distinctive method of arguing. To refute her ethics, you must refute that method.
ReadNew York University, History of Science Lecture Series, December 4, 2013.
ReadHow does precluding the initiation of physical force preclude theft and fraud?
ReadAltruism is not generosity, good will, or helping others. Those can be selfish. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness—and it cannot work, even by its own standards.
ReadTo live life to its fullest, don’t be a hedonist or a Nietzschean.
ReadWhen is it moral to shove a stranger out of danger or to take the car keys from a drunken friend?
ReadThis seminar examines the political and philosophical thought of Ayn Rand (1905–1982).
ReadAn exploration of three ways free-market capitalism has been defended in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.
ReadIn this seminar, we examine the shift from a Newtonian and Baconian outlook on science to a statistically oriented one.
ReadIn this course, we survey extraordinary advances in science and technology since the Renaissance.
ReadIn this course, we examine centuries of disagreements over what constitutes valid scientific method.
ReadUniversity of Pittsburgh, Center for Philosophy of Science, May, 2004.
ReadMy dissertation. A account of how philosophical induction was conceived in the ancient world and how that conception was later rediscovered by, especially, Francis Bacon.
ReadA book review in Technology and Culture 48, July 2007.
ReadPrior Analytics II 23 is not really about induction by complete enumeration, as all commentators have thought.
ReadA book review in Technology and Culture 50, July 2009.
ReadA book review in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
ReadStudents’ feedback posted at Rate My Professors.
ReadA book review in The Objective Standard, Summer 2008.
ReadStevens Institute of Technology, College of Arts and Letters, September 15, 2010.
ReadA review on Amazon, September 2010.
ReadSeptember 3, 2010 [Corrigenda and addenda are identified at the bottom.] I have been on the Board of Directors of
ReadHOPOS Conference, Budapest, Hungary, June, 2010.
ReadSt. John’s University, Philosophy Department, October 2007.
Read